You just wait. One day AI will lie. It will also begin to have opinions and bad temper. Also can be convicted for murder and do fight for the right to vote and become president of the US. Of course not. The recent image will be taken by a radar from a satellite which has the possibility of seeing there through the clouds; but this image cannot see some characteristics like color. So they can add that color by mixing with a classic image taken on a cloudless day.
The AI intervening to selectively superimpose on the old image the areas that have changed buildings, roads, equipment, etc. Even if you can, it will not look all that interesting. Clothes do things to the body, not making it look all that attractive.
Just google nude videos and have a look. Much more interesting if you want to see nude. And, the trick here was to use older pictures to fill in the ground. What would that mean when walking at the beach? Filling in nude pictures where girls are sitting? How fun This reminds me of Huawei "AI" that allows for great moon shots They should make it the other way around: we use to have very nasty weather in winter. If Microsoft can make the clouds disappear and let the sun shine, so that I can go swimming or fishing- that would be a real innovation!
Actually, Billy has exactly the opposite idea: pollute the atmosphere and make the clouds permanent. This would save the planet…. The late Sopphegi Eroduki Bombeko patented this very technology 75 years ago while a prisoner at the infamous Dudak prison. Most of his work has been stolen and without compensation to his heirs.
He died a tragic death when run over by a pie wagon which was delivering baked goods to the prison. The pie wagon incident was not an accident which I'm sure you already know.
What you likely don't know is it was sponsored by his detractors who concealed virtually every aspect of his history. Yeah, immensely disturbing but what governments continue to do, almost all of them! Then he tragically died the very day of our annual pie party. I have always wondered what happened to him…. Is this really super resolution or is it assuming that models are valid and replacing real data with model data? Super resolution can be achieved but once you use AI one is using models which may not be correct.
After paying for real imagery being given imagery that might not be correct if the models are wrong would be a significant let down. Using models and historic data to enhance images do not give you photos. It will give you images, but not photos. It might look good, but the data is partly invented and shows not reality.
One of the more phony things I have seen was the super resolution app for portraits. It had millions of sharp portraits. Then it could take a blurry one and make it sharp. I mean, super blurry and make it super sharp, with lots of detail that was not in the original unsharp image.
So, what it did was combining and morphing some sharp portraits to match the unsharp image. In reality making a portrait of a person that do not exist. So, what shall you do with a portrait of someone that do not exist? Who will buy it? The person that do not exist? Some relatives of the person that do not exist? The only thing I can think of is that it can be used in games. But is that breaking copyright and model laws?
They're not seeing through clouds, using what data is available to construct an image, they're showing historical data. If one is looking for changes to buildings, say due to construction or terrorism, one won't see it; in fact one will be fooled into thinking nothing has changed. If one is looking for activity trends, how many cars are on the road, once again one will be tricked. I see no value to this that couldn't be accomplished by just providing the historical image data.
It is poorly explained. SAR does "see" through clouds but not in the visible EM range. What is "sees" is not the image presented, it is data that needs to be converted.
Think about a very weird RAW. This is where AI comes but people have been doing this for years without AI. The article says that they construct an image based on radar imagery. The radar measures height, and the strength and polarization of the return signal provides clues about the nature of the surface.
For example, radar can distinguish between foliage and bare dirt. The Sentinel-1 has a resolution of 5 meters, which means it captures a lot less detail than a satellite photo. The radar cannot see color. It cannot see fog or smoke. So if a new building is built, the image generated by Microsoft would presumably show a building, but the color of the building would have to be a guess.
And if the building caught fire, with smoke billowing all over the place, the image generated by Microsoft would show nothing out of the ordinary. I can see the technology being useful, but only to people who have been trained to identify which details of the images are real, and which are simply guesses. However since the SAR images aren't taken at the same time as the visible ones they won't be providing an accurate representation of the location at a given time.
Further the process blends in historic optical imagery which is likely to be wrong if you're looking for temporally changing things. The AI is actually in the blending models; how the multiple non-cotemperaneous images are combined.
The cloud pictures is cheating. It uses historical data. Of course, you can do some reality checking with the radar data. A big building may be gone. I do not see that the Turing processing adds any details.
It looks like sharpening, increasing local contrast. That's why I'm surprised these results are so far so much of a nothing burger. I remember frequently asking if anyone had change for 50M people, after I'd been nuked. Tacky, nah, just where the World might still go They came piling out when it was over and you'd have a couple of guys sitting right next to you on the sofa with their tongues down each others throats, and we were simulating Nuclear annihilation.
We were cool with them and they were cool with us, live and let live I think it's just a simple of removing all "white clouds" by making the clouds transparent from the images taken at different times, stacking them as layers, and you'll see the details.
Of course, they have to "align" them too. Funny, Smart Sharpen on PS achieves more or less the same results as the "Turing process", on the same sample - with a very slight ringing, indeed. The one on the left looks like a photo, not SAR data. In fact, SAR collects data which cannot be directly represented as such a photo. Depending on the frequency, SAR can image under clouds or even under foliage. This is as old as SAR. What MS may have done is to partner with Airbus, etc.
The keyword being "may" so there's no guarantee it's an accurate representation. You need AI to use radar not affected by clouds? Or use a pic when there were no clouds? That is what passes for AI? It would have been nice to see the image comparison so that the first image would have been an image with clouds.
Could the system realistically add even the cars of different colors to the parking lot underneath the clouds JKP "Could the system realistically add even the cars of different colors to the parking lot underneath the clouds The first set of images is based on SAR data, the second one looks optical. SAR operates on EM frequencies too large to see color. I wish my camera could do the same, just from earth and up to space.
We only have clouds and snow the last 3 weeks. Gosh I hate Microsoft. I like how they spin it as useful for disaster response and agriculture when really the big money is about making money off our data.
Honestly I think this technology has become too powerful and we are too immature to possess it. I'd be more concerned if this was maybe the government or even other companies Google, or Apple. Not so worried about MIcrosoft. Everything these days is about making money, whether it's technology like this or something else.
You know, the camera company you bought your camera from also makes money off your data? The stores you buy toilet paper from also make money off your data your info. There are degrees and it still makes sense to be critical of all new technologies. It's kind of weak to say a store makes money off how I buy toilet paper to somehow dismiss a satellite that is ultra efficient at monitoring the globe.
Just like a person can pick up a rock to defend himself does not somehow justify weapons of mass destruction. And MIcrosoft can sell their technology just as easily as other companies. My point is that there is far much more to be worried about than someone making a buck off of you. I mean I bet amazon which supports DPR is making money off you right now, typing.
Because you see their ads, and DPR or Amazon gets money for ad views. Language supported English United States. Additional terms Space privacy policy Terms of transaction. Seizure warnings Photosensitive seizure warning. Report this product Report this app to Microsoft Thanks for reporting your concern.
Our team will review it and, if necessary, take action. Sign in to report this app to Microsoft. Report this app to Microsoft. Report this app to Microsoft Potential violation Offensive content Child exploitation Malware or virus Privacy concerns Misleading app Poor performance. How you found the violation and any other useful info. Submit Cancel. System Requirements Minimum Your device must meet all minimum requirements to open this product OS Windows 10 version Recommended Your device should meet these requirements for the best experience OS Windows 10 version Open in new tab.
To learn how much, see Surface storage. OneDrive is free cloud storage that comes with your Microsoft account. Note: OneDrive syncs files from the cloud to your Surface.
Syncing or sending data across a mobile broadband connection could result in extra charges. You can use USB storage or a microSD card of any size with your Surface to store your documents, music, videos, and pictures. If you have a Surface Book, you can also use a full-size SD card. Use File Explorer on your Surface to browse files and folders on connected devices. Libraries let you browse folders from many locations in one place. For example, you could have documents from several locations on your OneDrive, plus photos and drawings on your Surface, all in one Library.
Open your Libraries folder. If you don't see the folder in the left-side navigation, press and hold or right-click an open area in the left-side navigation, then select Show libraries. Select Include a folder , select the folder you would like to add to the library, then select Include folder.
Using OneDrive on Surface. Find your files. Free up drive space in Windows. Surface storage. OneDrive on your PC.
0コメント